This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Politics & Government

Is Pennsylvania Getting Out of the Booze Business?

State Republicans are making plans to privatize the liquor industry in the Keystone State.

Should Pennsylvania let private businesses sell alcohol?

That's the question state lawmakers will be pondering in the coming months as legislation that would privatize the liquor industry in the state appears to be gaining momentum.

A vestige of Prohibition, Pennsylvania is one of 18 states that exercise control of all or most aspects of and, next to Utah, the one that keeps the tightest grip on operations. But now, at the urging of House Majority Leader Mike Turzai (R-28) and with the endorsement of a just-released report commissioned by Gov. Tom Corbett, the idea of relinquishing this control appears to be getting traction in Harrisburg, though Chestnut Hill's state representative has her own reservations.

Find out what's happening in Chestnut Hill-Mt. Airywith free, real-time updates from Patch.

"The state needs to exit a business it should never have been in to begin with. Captive markets do not make for a free people," Corbett said in a statement signalling his support for the initiative.

More Stores, Higher Prices

Find out what's happening in Chestnut Hill-Mt. Airywith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Though it's unclear exactly what the new system would look like—the bill is still in committee in the House and has made no real progress in the Senate—Corbett and Turzai have each endorsed a limited auction of wholesale and retail liquor licenses, the sale of which would net the state between $1.1 and $1.6 billion according to the report by Public Financial Management Inc.

For consumers, Pennsylvania's wine and spirits landscape would shift considerably. By the reckoning of PFM, under the Corbett/Turzai plan, its number of retailers would increase by almost 150 percent—from 613 to approximately 1,500—while prices—already considerably higher than the national average—would likely increase as well, albeit more modestly. And because the state would almost certainly switch from a per-bottle to a per-gallon tax model, the cost of less expensive spirits would rise more than the top-shelf.

But Does Privatization Make "Cents?"

Momentum aside, the plan is not without its detractors.

"I'm against it," Rep. Rosita Youngblood (D-198) told Patch. "No way Jose."

Youngblood and other Democrats worry the state might be selling too low on a reliable revenue stream. Pennsylvania's annual liquor profits are substantial and could soon, they argue, make even a $1.6 billion windfall look like a loss.

"The $1.6 billion is a one-time thing, a shot in the arm, but we can always count on that revenue," Youngblood added.

Representing Delaware County, Rep. Tom Killion (R-168) is also a champion of privatization and a cosponsor of Turzai's bill.

"People are realizing that this is the way we need to go," he said. "I live six miles from the Delaware border and 10 miles from Total Wines and I can tell you my neighbors don't shop in our state stores. They shop in Delaware."

While the PFM study estimated that privatization would cost the state $408 million in 2012-13, it also held that the liquor business has grown less profitable for the state in recent years and will continue to do so. Over the last 10 years, according to the report, expenses for the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board have grown at 5.5 percent annually compared to 3.5 percent revenue growth.

"If we privatize our liquor system, it's going to be more revenue, not less," Killion said.

The plan has also found union opposition. The United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776, which represents 3,000 Wine and Spirits workers in the state, has suggested a shift to privatization could cost 5,000 jobs. The PFM estimated 3,200 will be lost, but didn't rule out the possibility that these losses could have a "multiplier effect"—depressing the economy and triggering other layoffs.

"The layofffs are a very big concern given our unemployment rate," Youngblood said. "What kind of training program will these people get? Where are these people going to go?"

Concern about the legislation's potential social costs has also been raised. Some are worried that the combination of an increase in stores and unshackling of the profit motive will enable more underage drinking.

The PFM report acknowledged that it's unclear what effect privatization would play on underage drinking and DUI incidences, but said there is some indication that "control" states like Pennsylvania are better able to restrict minors' access to alcohol.

Sen. LeAnna Washington (D-4) and Rep. Cherelle Parker (D-200) did not return requests for comment.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?

More from Chestnut Hill-Mt. Airy